Some
Things Are Just Too Hard to Swallow
By
Reverend Litton Logan
February 11, 2007
Luke
6:17--26 (TMNT)
Coming
down off the mountain with them, he stood on a plain surrounded by disciples,
and was soon joined by a huge congregation from all over Judea and Jerusalem,
even from the seaside towns of Tyre and Sidon. They had come both to hear him
and to be cured of their ailments. Those disturbed by evil spirits were healed.
Everyone was trying to touch him—so much energy surging from him, so many
people healed! Then he spoke:
“You’re blessed when you’ve lost it all.
God’s
kingdom is there for the finding.
“You’re blessed when you’re ravenously hungry.
Then you’re
ready for the Messianic meal.
“You’re blessed when the tears flow freely.
Joy comes
with the morning.
“Count yourself blessed every time someone cuts you down or
throws you out, every time someone smears or blackens your name to discredit me.
What it means is that the truth is too close for comfort and that that
person is uncomfortable. You can be glad when that happens—skip like a lamb, if you
like!—for even though they do not like it, I do … and all heaven applauds.
In addition, know that you are in good company; my preachers and
witnesses having always been treated like this.
“But it’s trouble
ahead if you think you have it made.
What you have
is all you’ll ever get.
“And it’s trouble ahead if you’re satisfied with yourself.
Your self
will not satisfy you for long.
“And it’s trouble ahead if you think life’s all fun and
games.
There’s
suffering to be met, and you’re going to meet it.
“There’s trouble ahead when you live only for the approval of
others, saying what flatters them, doing what indulges them. Popularity contests
are not truth contests—look how many scoundrel preachers were approved by your
ancestors! Your task is to be true, not popular.
Sermon:
William
G Carter in his book, Praying for a Whole
New World, tells a story about a man in a certain town.
This man walks into a bookstore to return a purchase. “It’s a
Bible,” he said, handing it to the clerk at the cash register.
“Was
it a gift?” asked the clerk. “No, I bought it for myself,” he said, “and
I made a mistake.”
“Didn’t
you like the translation? Or the
format?” “Oh no,” the man said, “the format was clear and the
translation was fine. I made a mistake.”
The
clerk said, “Well, I need to write down a reason for the return.” “In that
case,” said the man, “write down that there is a lot of stuff in that book
that is tough to swallow.” William G.
Carter, Praying for a Whole New World, CSS Publishing Company, 2000.
When
I think of things too hard to swallow raw oysters, Brussels sprouts come to
mind, or maybe liver. I recall something else that was difficult for me to
swallow as a youngster of about nine. My dad and I were once invited into the
home of a family that boarded my dad’s coon hunting dogs for dinner. My dad
didn’t want to offend the people so he agreed that we should eat with them.
This family was having baked opossum, sweet potatoes, collard greens, corn
bread, and buttermilk for dinner. My thoughts were, “Yuck, ‘possum,
gross!” I sat down at the table, which was lit by a single kerosene lamp in
its center, and was served a piece of opossum.
I was allowed to serve myself to the remaining fare, which I liked and
enjoyed. The opossum was tender,
salty, and greasy beyond belief. I took a bite, started to chew, and I promise
you that small bite grew to the size of a soft ball in my mouth.
I chewed and chewed, it got bigger and bigger, but finally I managed to
swallow it. After this interminable
meal from hell and a little sitting and visiting, my dad and I left for home.
As soon as we rounded a bend in the road, I told my dad to stop.
I hit the road while the car was still in motion and into the bushes I
went to rid myself of the opossum. I
had swallowed the opossum but it wouldn’t stay with me no matter what.
Later on in my life, I had further occasions to eat opossums and raccoons
and learned what to do to make them edible—drown the critters in Bar-B-Q
sauce.
There
are many passages and many teachings in the Bible that are not only tough to
swallow but don’t tend to stay with us well.
These passages from Luke’s Gospel we’ve heard read today are some of
the toughest to swallow, especially for many modern, Western Christians, if we
don’t understand Luke’s context.
Let
me give a brief overview of the context of Luke’s Gospel.
The Gospel is addressed to “most excellent Theophilus, (Luke 1:3) who
was most likely a prosperous, aristocratic Greek convert to Christianity.
Although some scholars take the name “Theophilus”, which means
“lover of God”, to mean the letter is addressed to all believers.
Most scholars come down on the side of Theophilus being an actual
aristocratic, Greek convert, and I do also.
Therefore,
Luke is dealing with matters of wealth, the poor or poor disciples takes on a
special meaning for him and Theophilus as well as Luke’s audience.
Luke
is also dealing with the delay of Jesus’ return to earth and seeks to
normalize relationships with the Roman government to avoid persecution for
Christians. Luke does this by shifting the bulk of the blame for Jesus’
crucifixion to the Jewish leadership of the day, who would be a lesser source of
antagonism and threat to Christians than the Romans.
In
our time together this morning, I invite you to try to identify with Theophilus.
That is unless you are a poor, destitute, despairing disciple of Christ
and your retched condition is the results of your being a follower of Jesus
Christ.
Some
of the difficulties that we encounter as we read these passages in Luke are that
we frequently hear Luke’s Sermon on the Plains through the ears of Matthew’s
Sermon on the Mount, which tends to be a more spiritualized form of the
blessings of Jesus with none of Luke’s woes.
It seems, some of Jesus’ original teachings were so radically
scandalous and offensive to many early Christians that the earliest oral
traditions of his teachings underwent some revisions to make them more palatable
to wider audiences who were not poor disciples.
In Matthew’s Sermon on the Mount, Matthew
changes the "poor" to the "poor in spirit" and he changes
those who "hunger" to those who "hunger and thirst for
righteousness.” In our
scriptures today, Luke is clearly addressing the poor and despised disciples in
the literal sense of those words, not the "poor in spirit" or
"those who hunger and thirst for righteousness," as in Matthew (Mt.
5:3, 6).
The
striking differences between the Gospels reflect each writer’s context and
their agendas as they deal with prevailing issues in their respective faith
communities.
Another
big problem with these passages and the book of Luke in general are the poor and
hungry. I think this is interesting
given Luke is writing to Theophilus, an aristocratic, prosperous Greek
Christian. However, who are
they—the poor? If you look
closely, at verses 20 you will see the answer.
It is the disciples who are the poor, the hungry, and who weep.
Therefore, we have the poor and victimized Jewish disciples of Jesus’
day—his audience; the poor, hungry, persecuted, and victimized Christian
disciples of Luke’s day—his audience, and by implication the poor, hungry,
and victimized Christian disciples of any time. We must remember that in Luke’s time to be a disciple or
follower of Jesus often cost people their jobs, and support of family, friends,
and communities. As a rule,
Christians would have been from the poorer classes or made poor because of their
faith. The exception is noted by
Luke—ole Theo.
These
scriptures are frequently used to justify Jesus’ mandate for Christians to
address poverty, hunger, and injustice in the world, but I believe the
scriptures correctly read give us a little different view.
Again, I cite verse 20. I
believe that as Christians we should be concerned and involved in alleviating
poverty, hunger, diseases, and injustices to humanity and creatures alike.
I would however cite different scriptures than these in Luke for this
mandate for no other reason than who these passages are addressed to—the
disciples of Jesus.
Since
the dawn of human history, there have been the “haves” and the
“have-nots”. It is an unpleasant fact in all societies and cultures.
We may give all sorts of rationales from
why the poor are poor, the rich are rich; however, the fact remains that
there is a moral dimension present between some people’s surplus’s and other
people’s necessities. This
moral dimension is well illustrated and documented in the Old and New
Testaments. However, I do not see this as the major concern of these scriptures
we heard read this morning from Luke as much as I agree with the idea.
Having
said that, let us now turn to our passage from Luke where in Jesus addresses his
disciples. The poor disciples
referred to here as well as the multitude are people who are powerless in their
plights-- possibly in part because of cultural limitations and in part, because
they are followers of Jesus.
Luke
declared early in his Gospel through the words of Mary the Mother of Jesus (Magnificat
1:46-55) that with the arrival of God’s reign there will be a complete
reversal of fortunes for the rich and the poor, the powerful and the powerless,
the full and the empty. It is a
fair assumption that Luke has Mary referring specifically to the poor and
victimized faithful of God. This
reversal for Luke is a reality that was present in Jesus’ ministry, in the
ministry of those who followed him, and the coming fruition of Kingdom of God in
the future.
In
our scriptures today, Jesus has been on a mountain praying with his disciples
from which he has chosen twelve, whom he calls apostles. We now see Jesus and the twelve apostles along with the
remaining disciples coming down onto a plain.
High places, mountains, wildernesses, etc., are places of prayer,
spiritual struggle, or spiritual discernment.
In today’s scriptures, the implications are that Jesus brings down from
on high certain spiritual insights from his time of prayer and imparts his
insights primarily to his disciples in the presences of the common people of his
day who came seeking healings, not a sermon. Jesus implies to the multitude that overhears his teachings
that if they, like his disciples, also become his disciples they will reap the
benefits and blessings of which he speaks but they will also have to live under
the ethical and moral mandates of his teachings.
Furthermore,
Luke’s references to predominately Jewish and Gentile geographic areas is
Luke’s way of revealing the universal nature of Jesus’ message and blessings
for all believers—Jew and gentile alike.
To
reiterate, the people who attended Jesus’ teachings and healing session in
Luke today would have been the common Jewish folks, who had been marginalized
and discounted by the prevailing religious and political establishment for a
variety of reasons. Luke’s reader
and later audiences would have been mostly gentiles, who, with the exception of
Theophilus, either were slaves or from lower socio-economic or disadvantaged
classes. They were also people who
have been or are living in fear of persecution for their faith from both Roman
and Jewish sources. Armed with
these understanding we see why Luke recalls teachings of Jesus that help such
people understand God’s
unqualified love, care, and concern for them regardless of their socio-economic
status or their ethnic backgrounds. These passages we’ve heard today may also
be a big hint to Theo to use his wealth and standing to aid poor, hungry, and
persecuted Christians.
Again, here the words of Luke:
“You’re
blessed when you’ve lost it all.
God’s kingdom is there for the finding.
Jesus says the poor disciples and those
would be disciples are blessed; that is fortunate, when they have none of the
material stuff that breeds the prideful self-reliance of the rich and powerful.
(Do you hear that, Theo?) Please
note: neither Jesus nor Luke says anything about the unbelieving poor.
When the disciple is destitute or has lost it all they must live by faith
that God will provide and protect. The
essence of being a disciple of Christ for Luke is just that—absolute faith and
reliance on God for one’s “… daily
bread”. The poor disciple may
have this situation forced upon them, but they are nonetheless closer to God’s
ideal for humanity than many of the pious, rich, and powerful, who suffer under
the delusions of idolatrous, self-sufficiency.
(Do you hear that Theo?) Thus,
we see the ”why” of the reversal of which Mary sang.
Jesus indicates the poor disciples are spiritually superior because of
their absolute trust in God while the pious, rich, and powerful are spiritually
inferior because of their prideful and idolatrous self-sufficiency.
(Do you hear that Theo?) When
the Kingdom of God comes fully on earth, the poor disciples will be considered
the most prosperous and prominent according to Kingdom values.
(Do you hear that Theo?)
“You’re
blessed when you’re ravenously hungry.
Then you’re ready for the Messianic meal.
Luke seems to indicate that when a person
is really hungry, I mean starving, they are far more open to eat whatever is set
before them—kosher or not. Likewise,
Luke also indicates that starving people are ready to eat the Messianic meal,
that is not only to eat the physical food provide by caring others—gentile or
Jew--but ready to swallow the truth of Jesus as the Christ, contrary to their
traditions, beliefs, and Messianic expectations.
“You’re
blessed when the tears flow freely.
Joy comes with the morning.
The apostles and disciples are blessed
when their conditions of poverty, hunger, and social derision brings them to
tears of despair. In such times,
the disciple stands smack in the middle of the Kingdom of God because in order
to carry on they must have absolute trust and faith in God.
When the disciples have nothing left to rely upon and their illusions of
self-sufficiency are gone they are right were God wants all humanity to be.
I believe, God grieves for the suffering and deprivation that brings
people to points of physical, psychological, and spiritual destitution, but God
rejoices when in such conditions we turn to God in absolute faith and
dependency. In so doing we receive
the blessing of God’s presence of which Jesus speaks.
Jesus says that deprivation and suffering
because of one’s faith in him will bring the disciple eternal laughter and joy
with God.
“Count
yourself blessed every time someone cuts you down or throws you out, every time
someone smears or blackens your name to discredit me.
What it means is that the truth is too close for comfort and that that
person is uncomfortable. You can be glad when that happens—skip like a lamb,
if you like!—for even though they don’t like it, I do … and all heaven
applauds. And know that you are in good company; my preachers and witnesses have
always been treated like this.
In our country, we have little fear of persecution because we are
Christians. However, I am afraid
this fact begs a question—Why not? God
knows there are plenty situations in our modern world and in our country that
need to hear the words of Jesus and suffer the social, moral, and spiritual
disruption the Gospel can bring. Why is it that as Christians we bask in the
safety and freedom of our faith and do not take up the responsibility of
addressing inequities, injustice, and sin in our world?
Why aren’t we struggling to make life morally, spiritually, and
materially better for future generations? Not many of us fall into the category
of the truly poor disciple—the destitute; not many of us are starving; our
material situations in life are not so desperate and depressing that it brings
us to tears of existential despair. We
are definitely not being persecuted for our faith in Christ.
And, as Jesus and Luke point for many Christians it is their comfort,
safety, and prosperity—the very things they see as blessings--that actually
hinders some people from fullest participation in the Kingdom of God on earth
now and yet to be. (Do you hear
that Theo?) Jesus and Luke indicate
that it is hard for those who are comfortable and self-reliant to participate
fully in the Kingdom of God because they rely more on their abilities than on
God. As Jesus says in Luke 18:25 it
is easier for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle than for a rich person
to enter the Kingdom of God. (Do you hear that Theo?)
Jesus’ reference is not that actual wealth hinders entrance into the
Kingdom but the illusions of self-sufficiency and independence of God that
wealth fosters hinders entrance. (Do
you hear that Theo?)
However,
how do we as blessed, prosperous, modern Christian “Theophiluses” hear
Luke’s message. Well, we may have to do like many ancient Christians; embrace
Matthew’s more spiritualized understanding. However, truth be told we need to understand along with
Theophilus that we are in fact poor. Nothing
of this earth that we have confidence in--401k’s, Social Security, stocks,
bonds, religious affiliation, military might, citizenship, acts of religious
merit, denominational affiliations, etc., are any guarantees against the next
moment of life or death.
Therefore,
we must be as Jesus, willing to be open to total self-expenditure under the
leadership of the Holy Spirit and to make ourselves totally and completely
available to God. We are to respond
to the Holy Spirit’s leadership regardless of our calls or the costs. Furthermore, in those areas of our life as disciples of
Christ where we have no answers or resources we must trust God to give answers
and provide for our needs. Remember
supply and demand is one and the same thing in the Divine Mind. In addition, as Jesus, we must assume our responsibility to
teach and proclaim the words of God to a world hell-bent in its illusions of
self-sufficiency and independence of God. Not only that, but we are to be
performative—that is we are to perform blessings not just mouth the words of
blessing. (By implication Theo,
become a blessing to the poor, hungry, despairing disciples of Christ.) We must also pronounce the woes or condemnations of Jesus upon
the pious, powerful, and the
religiously ingenuous:
24 “But woe to you who are rich, for you
have received your consolation.
25 “Woe to you who are full now, for you will be hungry.
“Woe to you who are laughing now, for you will mourn and weep.
26 “Woe
to you when all speak well of you, for that is what their ancestors did to
the false prophets.
In essence, “Woe to all who worship their sense of economic or
religious self-sufficiency even a little bit.
(Most excellent Theophilus, did you hear that?)
Finally,
we as Christians must repent—turn around--live our lives in the way of
Jesus—totally dependent upon God. As
Jesus, we must turn from serving our own interests and worshiping at the altars
of self-sufficiency. We as individual disciples must take the responsibility for
kingdom building not pass it off to religious or government bureaucracies with
their imperatives of institutional survival at the expense of mission and
people. We must address sin
and injustice in our world with the words and deeds of God. Kingdom building is
not more and bigger religion but more disciples of Christ on the plains, the
level places of every day life where fellow disciples live, meeting each other
with God’s grace, help, encouragement, and support.
However, Theophilus, the most import thing we must do in addition to all
these performative things is struggle mentally and spiritually to rely on
God’s will and ways in our lives when everything in us leans toward our
understandings, will, and ways. That
is, when God’s ways contradict our values, our will, and our sense of
self-sufficiency, we must become poor to ourselves before God without
equivocation.
I know that some of what I am saying is tough to swallow. However, why is
it that we strain at swallowing gnats and swallow camels with ease?
Why is it that we strain to depend on God’s will and ways and swallow
all sorts of irrelevant ideological, political, materialistic, and religious
doctrinal stuff with no problem?
However,
Theophilus, swallowing the teachings of Jesus is eating the Messianic Meal in
the Kingdom of God in the here and now while looking forward to that day of its
fruition. It is a meal that may be
hard to swallow but it will stay with us through out all eternity and you
won’t have to drown it with Bar-B-Q sauce to make it palatable.